Discussion of the issues that affect you on a local, provincial and federal level
Monday, May 25, 2026
Taseko Mines proposes Corporate Name Change at its' upcoming AGM
Saturday, November 22, 2025
Workplace Fatality at Gibraltar Mines'
Taseko Mines Limited has confirmed that an accident occurred at its Gibraltar copper mine northeast of Williams Lake, BC on Friday November 21, 2025 resulting in the death of one contract worker. No further injuries have been reported.
The incident occurred in an active mining area and was discovered at approximately 5 pm. The accident site has been secured and mining activity halted while an investigation is underway. RCMP personnel and the BC Coroners Service are currently on-site. The BC Ministry of Mining & Critical Minerals has also been notified.
Gibraltar personnel are cooperating fully with the investigation.
Taseko Vice President of Corporate Affairs Sean Magee stated:
“We are saddened to report the loss of a valued colleague at Gibraltar, and offer our deepest condolences to affected family, co-workers and friends.
“Our primary concern is the health, safety and well-being of our employees. Accordingly, we have halted all activity at Gibraltar until the accident can been fully investigated, and will make counselling and support services available to Gibraltar employees affected by this tragic event.”
Thursday, June 5, 2025
Tŝilhqot’in announce historic agreement with B.C. & Taseko Mines for Teẑtan Biny / Fish Lake
Tuesday, February 11, 2025
Taseko Releases Economic Impact Study for Gibraltar Copper Mine
Thursday, January 14, 2016
Taseko Mines Receives Shareholder Meeting Requisition
January 13, 2016, Vancouver, BC
Taseko (TSX: TKO; NYSE MKT: TGB) (the "Company") today announced that it has been provided with a shareholder meeting requisition notice (the "Requisition") dated January 13, 2016 from Raging River Capital LP ("Raging River"), a holder of 5.1% of Taseko's shares which has declared itself to be an activist investor.
The Requisition demands the convening of a meeting of shareholders within four months at which shareholders will be asked to vote on a special resolution to remove three incumbent Taseko directors and replace them with four Raging River nominees, while also increasing the number of Taseko directors to nine from eight. The special resolution would require approval by a 2/3 majority of votes represented. Alternatively, if the special resolution is not passed, Raging River would ask shareholders to pass an ordinary resolution (50%+1 of votes represented) to set the number of Taseko directors at 12 and elect four Raging River nominees.
The Company is reviewing the Requisition and will provide a detailed response in the near future. Taseko's Board of Directors has formed a special committee of three independent directors who have not been targeted by Raging River to assist the Board in its response to the Requisition. Shareholders will receive information by way of a Management Information Circular well in advance of the meeting once the date has been set. Shareholders should read the circular carefully before reaching a decision with regard to their votes. In the meantime, there is no need for shareholders to take any action.
For further information on Taseko, please see the Company's website www.tasekomines.com or contact:
Brian Bergot, Vice President, Investor Relations - 778-373-4533 or toll free 1-877-441-4533
Russell Hallbauer
President and CEO
Friday, December 2, 2011
BREAKING NEWS: TNG gets Injunction, but must pay court costs to Taseko
1) Justice Grauer issued injunction against Taseko preventing exploratory work and denied #Taseko its injunction against the Tsilhqot’in!
2) Injunction has time limit (Xeni Gwet'in or TNG gets time [90 days] to file judicial review of permits), Justice Grauer ordered costs against Tsilhqot'in, payable to Taseko, as an innocent 3rd party in this proceeding
Update: Story from CTV British Columbia here
Update #2 - Story from Williams Lake Tribune here
Update #3 - Story from Global BC here and Globe & Mail here
Thursday, December 1, 2011
TNG/Taseko Court Case ruling on Friday at 3pm
See more here
As soon as I learn of the Court's decision - I'll post that information here
Monday, October 17, 2011
Taseko Mines on upcoming environmental review (2nd Prosperity Mine proposal)
Brian Battison, V-P of corporate affairs with Taseko Mines, says he’s disappointed first nations leaders continue to oppose the latest prosperity mine project.
In fact Battison says Taseko has reached out to first nations leaders, albeit unsuccessfully. He does point out however that many people in the First Nations community don’t agree with their leadership.
Battison says for example that “many First Nations people come to our (Taseko’s) office, talk about the need for this project out in their community, the kinds of opportunities it will bring and mean for their people.”
He says the new mine would create thousands of jobs, new opportunities for business and new revenues for government all of which he says will boost the economy and help fund essential public services.
Ottawa has indicated an environmental assessment of the latest Prosperity Mine proposal will start on or before November 7th.
First Nations leaders are in Ottawa this week in an effort to lobby politicians to scrap the environmental assessment.
Monday, August 15, 2011
2nd Public Environmental Public Review for New Prosperity Mine proposal by October??
With the revised project description in hand, we expecte that the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (CEAA) will confirm its adequacy. The Federal Government then has up to 90 days to: coordinate with the Province of British Columbia, prepare a detailed background document, including project scope, and launch the Environmental Assessment review. The Company expects the Environmental Assessment review to commence by October 2011.
It seems the above suggests a possible Joint Environmental Review (Provincial/Federal) for the "New Prosperity" mine project. If this can be done with local First Nations, then I believe it would be a huge step forward. If not - then we may see a repeat of the public input brought forward in 2009/2010 for the original Prosperity Mine proposal.
For the record - I still support this mine being allowed to move forward past the environmental review stage and being allowed to commence operations
SBF