Showing posts with label BC Liberals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BC Liberals. Show all posts

Saturday, October 24, 2020

General Voting Day/42nd BC General Election

Today, voters across the 87 British Columbia Provincial Electoral Districts are voting, on General Voting Day, for a MLA/Member of the Legislative Assembly.  This after mail in ballots/absentee ballots having been distributed and returned to Elections BC and 7 days of Advance Voting.  

You can locate your specific polling station here while Elections BC has General Voting Day tips for you, the voter, here

After voting closes at 8pm tonight -- preliminary results will be available on the Elections BC website here while final vote results are not expected until November 16th

My personal thanks to the candidates who put their names forward for consideration of election along with their support teams.  All of them must be congratulated for participating in their own way in the thing we call our provincial democracy.... 

Looking forward to hearing the results after 8pm tonight!

SF

Sunday, October 21, 2012

An Action Plan for Healthy Forests

Op-Ed by Hon. Steve Thomson, BC's Minister of Forests:

With the release of ‘Beyond the Beetle: A Mid-Term Timber Supply Action Plan’, we have outlined a clear strategy to help our forests recover from the damage done by the mountain pine beetle infestation.

Unfortunately the release of the action plan has led to the spread of misinformation and it’s important for your readers to know the facts.

Government is not advocating logging in reserves. Reserves have been set up to manage crucial wildlife habitat, biodiversity, viewscapes and old growth forests. Those reserves are important and need to be kept.

If a community believes the reserves no longer serve these purposes, they can initiate a discussion with government. Only then would government consider altering any of those designations. Along with having community support, any proposed changes must be ecologically sound and supported by science. Any such proposals will be considered on a case-by-case basis.

Managing our forests is a complex issue, but the outcome we all want is simple: an industry that continues to support workers and communities. In coming up with this plan, we’re building on the $884 million we have spent since 2001 fighting the infestation and its environmental and economic impacts.

We’re advocating for better use of the wood in beetle-affected areas, as opposed to increasing the number of trees cut. Not all beetle-damaged timber will supply sawmills, but it will supply the growing wood bioeconomy sector. Any areas harvested will be reforested with improved seed and start to contribute ecological values sooner than they might otherwise.

The action plan includes a 10-year forest inventory plan, with the first five years focused on re-inventorying the hardest-hit mountain pine beetle areas – work which is already well underway. Critics say this work should have started sooner, but while the pine beetle epidemic was at its peak, the ever-changing landscape of the beetle’s destruction made it difficult to carry out a comprehensive inventory.

We are investing in innovative silviculture practices to grow more trees and grow them faster, and are working with licensees on comprehensive plans that cover the entire timber supply areas. These plans contribute to growing fibre but they are equally about growing healthy forests to preserve water, wildlife, visuals and other values. These five-year plans include our latest knowledge about the effects of climate change and fire management planning.

The action plan also proposes legislation to convert volume-based forest licences to area-based forest licences – but these conversions would only occur through local conversations and after consultation. We will also create a new supplemental forest licence to increase bioeconomy opportunities.

In 2001, our government inherited a forest industry that demanded reform – mired in out-dated and inefficient policies that were oblivious to a global marketplace. Despite unprecedented challenges, including the crash of the U.S. housing market along with the pine beetle infestation, we’ve implemented innovative and progressive measures to reclaim a position as a global leader in sustainable forestry.

Working together with communities, First Nations and industry, our accomplishments are many and varied, including new markets in Asia, a burgeoning bioeconomy sector, increased local participation in forestry through community forests and First Nation tenures, and new value-added wood building products like cross-laminated timber.

Based on the unanimous recommendations of an all-party legislative committee, ‘Beyond the Beetle: A Mid-Term Timber Supply Action Plan’ will position communities, First Nations and workers so they can prosper from a post-beetle forest industry in B.C.’s Interior.

Adrian Dix will raise your taxes...

Courtesy of the BC Government Caucus:

Adrian Dix’s recent visit to Toronto for a Globe and Mail editorial board chit-chat and online comments by Nelson-Creston MLA Michelle Mungall are leading to more questions about how high taxes will be raised under and NDP government, asserts B.C.’s finance minister Michael de Jong.

In an editorial this week, the Globe and Mail states, “Mr. Dix has yet to say how he would generate greater revenues without raising taxes, nor did he fill in the details about his industrial strategy and vision for economic development, including the conditions under which he would support future pipeline developments. That is a concern.” (Globe and Mail, Oct. 16, 2012, Online)

“We’re no longer a point of debating if an NDP government will raise the taxes of British Columbians, it’s now a question of how much will they raise them by,” said de Jong, MLA for Abbotsford West. “Given Mr. Dix’s refusal, once again, to spell out his spending plans he’s running out of excuses. Taxpayers should also share the Globe and Mail’s concerns.”

Adrian Dix has already repeatedly stated an NDP government would raise taxes on financial institutes which included credit unions, potentially increasing costs and fees for British Columbians who are members of institutes including Prospera, Island Savings, Central 1, and VanCity.

More questions were raised when Nelson-Creston MLA Michelle Mungall stated via Twitter that, “Canada is #3 in the world in giving up revenue via tax cuts.”

“Cutting taxes is not the government giving up revenue as Mungall likes to think, it’s called making life more affordable for B.C. families. We believe that individuals and families are best at managing and deciding what they should do with their money – not governments. It’s clear B.C.’s New Democrats have never left their tried-and-true roots of taxing working British Columbians in order to curry favour with their big union friends.

Saturday, July 21, 2012

BC Conservatives' in the Cariboo-Chilcotin

This past Thursday - BC Conservative Kamloops area Director Alan Forseth reported on his blog that the BC Conservative Party Constituency Associations for the Richmond & Delta areas have now been formally recognized by Elections BC

Read that blog post here

Meanwhile - here in Cariboo-Chilcotin & Cariboo-North, there isn't a lot of activity from BC Conservative supporters in this area.  At one point, the BC Conservatives' had a Cariboo-Chilcotin Riding Assocation President in Brad McRae (former City of WL Senior Bylaw Officer) while, to the best of my knowledge, no BC Conservative Party activity in Cariboo-North

If the plan for BC Conservatives' is to run 85 candidates in all 85 Constituencies, including Cariboo-North & Cariboo-Chilcotin, they need to very soon get active BC Conservative Constituency Associations in Cariboo-North & Cariboo-Chilcotin, otherwise they risk being seen as a "fringe party" and thus leaving Cariboo-Chilcotin to be fought between the BC NDP (Charlie Wyse) and BC Liberals (Donna Barnett) and in Cariboo-North, having next year's election fought between Bob Simpson, and the candidates for the BC Liberals and BC NDP

SBF

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

A Proud BC Liberal Supporter...

Readers' on this blog know that I'm a proud BC Liberal supporter and will continue to support them, much to the chagrin to BC Conservative supporters...

BC Premier Christy Clark reviews 2012 in this video blog post - see below:



But I'd point out that as we approach the 1st Anniversary (Feb 26th, 2011) of Christy Clark winning the BC Liberal Party Leadership, she and I would both agree that much work remains to be done but she's insured a good start but the global economy doesn't help and it certainly doesn't help that she has had to clean up a couple of files (HST & CLBC) that she did not initiate under her Premiership but has had to get fixed because that is what the public demanded.

But as Premier Clark notes - BC Liberal Party members', like myself, will have significant input into Party policy going into the 2013 Provincial General Election (good on BC Liberals to use online platforms to gather policy input).

Like any government (and party members having input into that government) - it sometimes moves slower than you want but it very well has legitimate reasons as to why it can't move faster (hint to BC Conservatives & BC NDP on HST Rules... tax law is not as simplistic as you make it out to be...)

Meanwhile, over on his blog - my uncle and BC Conservative Regional Director Alan Forseth has a blog post worth reading:

1) Why I can say this? I'm one of the voters BC Liberals drove away!  - Read here

Having read the article that Mr. Forseth refers to - Warren Kinsella speaks the truth.

Remember the elections of 1991 & 1996 ... when the "right" is split like it regrettably is right now - the BC NDP always win.  Also - think about this - both the BC NDP/BC Liberals had plenty of contenders for their leadership races but yet the BC Conservatives acclaimed their leader... people should ask - Why is that ... ?  People should ask Mr. Cummins and his party what kind of provincial political experience they bring to the table... especially voters' should ask if Mr. Cummins (if Premier) will abandon his "bull-headed" fights over First Nations' rights and fisheries... one of my personal chief reasons NOT to join the BC Conservatives...

So as we progress towards 2013 - should the BC Liberals' lose in 2013 (and it is starting to look that way, based on recent polls), the NDP should thank the BC Conservatives for playing spoiler, just like the Federal Reform  & Canadian Alliances parties played spoiler in the 1993, 1997 and 2000 Federal Elections... until the conservative right parties merged into one Federal Conservative party in 2003 and thus allow like-minded Conservatives on the federal scene to win minority governments in 2006, 2008, 2010 with a majority government in 2011

Finally - Message to BC Conservatives or disenfranchised BC Liberals...

Come back and join the BC Liberal "coalition" before you help indirectly to elect BC NDP MLA's and send BC back to the "lost 90's"

SBF

Sunday, October 23, 2011

"Can't Afford Adrian Dix" website

Courtesy of the BC Liberal Party:

A new website has been launched to inform British Columbians about Adrian Dix, the chief architect of the disastrous ‘90s and BC NDP leader.

The new website, www.CantAffordDix.ca details Adrian Dix’s reckless funding promises to increase government spending in British Columbia by over $15 billion and his devastating track record from the '90s.

As the chief architect of the BC NDP government in the ‘90s, Dix is responsible for the financial chaos left behind by his party’s fiscal mismanagement of the province’s economy.

If elected Dix’s uncontrolled tax and spend promises will bankrupt the province, leave future generations in debt, and drive investment and jobs away from B.C.

The website reminds the public of the remarkable change in British Columbia's fortunes since the BC Liberals formed government in 2001.

We Can’t Afford Adrian Dix and the BC NDP, below are some examples why:

• Adrian Dix fabricated a memo from the premier’s office meant to protect his boss and close friend, Premier Glen Clark, from a police investigation.
• Adrian Dix and the NDP introduced the job killing corporate capital tax in 1992 as a temporary measure, but it remained in place until the BC Liberals phased it out in 2002 – a decade later.
• Adrian Dix and the NDP introduced a surtax of up to 3 per cent on what they deemed “luxury” vehicles – anything selling for $30,000 or more – which particularly punished drivers in rural B.C., where a pickup is not a luxury.
• Adrian Dix’s reckless funding promises to increase government spending in British Columbia by over $15 billion and his devastating track record from the '90s.

These facts and much more can be found on www.CantAffordDix.ca.

We have worked very hard to make British Columbia the best place to live, work and play, we can’t afford to go back.

Monday, October 10, 2011

Latest Provincial Political Poll from Ipsos-Reid

Recently - Ipsos-Reid did a poll on support for provincial political parties.  You can review the particulars of that poll here

Overall - the NDP hold a 36-45% support lead over the reigning BC Liberals who have between 30-38% and voter support for the BC Conservatives' between 9-12% and 16% who are undecided.

But - on support for provincial political leaders:

Christy Clark - 45% support with 46% non-support and 9% saying "Don't Know"
Adrian Dix - 43% support with 36% non-support and 21% saying "Don't Know"
John Cummins - 23% support with 33% non-support and 45% saying "Don't Know"

Finally - by sub-region:

Metro Vancouver:

NDP - 45% support
BC Liberals - 35% support
BC Conservatives - 14% support

Vancouver Island:

NDP - 54% support
BC Liberals - 31% support
BC Conservatives - 8% support

Interior/North:

NDP - 39% support
BC Liberals - 46% support
BC Conservatives - 9% support

Final Comments:

While the NDP have support in Metro Vancouver and Vancouver Island, the reigning BC Liberals have comfortable support in the Interior and Northern BC.  Meanwhile - the BC Conservatives have just enough support to play "spoiler" in Interior/North and Vancouver Island to the BC Liberals' but could have enough support (if developed over time) to elect a few MLA's in Metro Vancouver.  Also - if John Cummins converts his 45% "don't know" into "support", things could get really ugly for the BC Liberals as we approach 2013

Overall - the BC Liberals have a ton of work to do in Metro Vancouver/Vancouver Island to get rid of the NDP's lead in these sub-regions while watching the BC Conservatives behind them, with little time remaining to do so (with just under 2 years before the next election)

Finally - while not part of this poll - if the NDP/Liberals and BC Conservatives run candidates in Cariboo-North - I wonder if a 4 way race for this riding could spell doom for Independent MLA Bob Simpson come April of 2013...given when he ran in 2009, it was a two way race with only the NDP/BC Liberals...but on the other hand - BC Conservatives could, in a 4 way race, play "spoiler" to the BC Liberal candidate.  But it would come down to how many "NDP" supporters back Mr. Simpson as an independent and not back the local NDP Candidate.  This riding may end up being one to watch - given the only other independent MLA in BC is in Delta South (Vicki Huntingdon)

SBF

Saturday, September 24, 2011

BCLTV - September 23rd edition

\

September 23rd edition of BC Liberal TV "Rewind"

In this episode:

1) BC JOBS Plan
2) Healthy Families, Healthy Communities
3) Granville Seniors' Centre


Tuesday, September 13, 2011

NDP Blast from the Past - Post-Secondary Edition

Issued yesterday by the BC Government Caucus:

Today’s hollow and contrived policy pronouncement echoes the back-of-the-napkin planning that Dix displayed a penchant for when he was the chief architect of the last BC NDP government between 1991-2001

Today, Mr. Dix’s inability to answer the most basic questions on his latest spending promises proves again that he intends to take British Columbia backward to the disastrous economic policies of the 1990s that hurt both students and graduates.

Adrian Dix’s record speaks for itself. His hasty promises without any plan to pay for them can only mean one thing – higher income taxes for new post-secondary graduates (and everyone else) if they are fortunate enough to find a job in a hostile investment climate.

Students who graduated in the 1990s faced a brutal youth employment market:

• From 1998 to 2001, B.C. had the highest youth unemployment rate west of Quebec, and was higher than the national average in each of those years.

• In every year since 2005, B.C. has had a lower youth unemployment rate than the Canadian average.

• Between 1991 and 2001, the BC NDP created only 2,000 net jobs for youth in the province – a paltry average of only 200 a year.

• Under the BC Liberals, from 2001 to 2010, 43,800 net jobs were created for youth. In an average six month period over the past decade, more jobs were created for youth in B.C. than were created over an entire decade of BC NDP government.

• In 1998, youth unemployment reached 17.4% in B.C., higher than any province outside of the Maritimes.

• Ten years later, under the BC Liberals, youth unemployment had dropped to 7.7%, lower than any province other than Alberta.

• Between 1991 and 2001, the number of employed youth increased by just 0.72%, compared to 15.72% between 2001 and 2010.

• From 2001 to 2010, B.C.'s youth job creation rate was 15.72% - the highest in the country, and nearly three times the national average.

Post-secondary:

• Today, B.C. currently has the fourth-lowest tuition in Canada: $4,802 is the average tuition undergraduates paid at B.C.’s public institutions in 2010-11.

• Student debt load in B.C. is the third lowest in Canada, and approximately 70% of students graduate without a B.C./Canada student loan.

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

BC Liberals attack NDP on Municipal Auditor-General

Earlier today - the BC Government Caucus (BC Liberals) released a statement attacking the provincial opposition BC NDP over a Municipal Auditor-General.  See that statement here

Interestly enough - Section 1 of the Community Charter says:

Principles of municipal governance

1 Municipalities and their councils are recognized as an order of government within their jurisdiction that

(a) is democratically elected, autonomous, responsible and accountable,
(b) is established and continued by the will of the residents of their communities, and
(c) provides for the municipal purposes of their communities.

(2) In relation to subsection (1), the Provincial government recognizes that municipalities require

(a) adequate powers and discretion to address existing and future community needs,
(b) authority to determine the public interest of their communities, within a legislative framework that supports balance and certainty in relation to the differing interests of their communities,
(c) the ability to draw on financial and other resources that are adequate to support community needs,
(d) authority to determine the levels of municipal expenditures and taxation that are appropriate for their purposes, and
(e) authority to provide effective management and delivery of services in a manner that is responsive to community needs.

I'm well on record opposing the idea of a Municipal Auditor-General, with blog posts from yesterday see here and last week (see here) on this subject

It seems Victoria has not learned its' lessons over the HST - shoot first and ask questions later.  The idea of a Municipal Auditor-General has been thrust upon municipalities with inadequate consultation, much like the HST was thrust on BC'ers with no consultation prior to implementation, hence the reason why we had the HST Referendum

Finally - I respect the views of John Les on many provincial matters but this idea is one I stubbornly oppose and disagree with him on.  Is he now saying card-carrying BC Liberals - like me, who oppose this idea somehow are "BC NDP'ers"??

SBF

Saturday, July 16, 2011

"Listening First" Tour comes to Williams Lake and Quesnel

In a very positive move - the new BC Liberal Party President Sharon White is sending her Deputy - Bill Belsey (former MLA for North Coast for 37th Parliament of BC - 2001 to 2005) on a "Listening First" Tour which seeks to ask "What can the BC Liberal Party do to help serve our local communities better?"

To that end - the "Listening First" Tour will be in Quesnel and Williams Lake on Wednesday, July 20th as follows:

Quesnel:

Time - 9:30am
Location - Granville's Coffee Cafe

You are asked to RSVP ASAP with Carol Pitkin (BC Liberal Cariboo-North Riding Assoc President) at 250-991-2878 or fill out the form here

Williams Lake:

Time - 12:00pm
Location - IRL Truck Centres – 4775 Cattle Drive (off of Mackenzie Avenue, across from Brandt Tractors')

You are asked to RSVP ASAP with Bill Carruthers (BC Liberal Cariboo-Chilcotin Riding Assoc President) at 250-398-0494 or fill the form here

I plan to attend the session in Williams Lake and I strongly encourage all BC Liberal Party members in Cariboo-North or Cariboo-Chilcotin to attend these sessions next Wednesday

Make your BC Liberal Party work for you!!