Showing posts with label Community Forest. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Community Forest. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 9, 2022

Have your say on Quesnel’s Community Forest Application

Courtesy of the City of Quesnel:

Editor's Note -- this week's Quesnel City Council column is written by Quesnel Mayor Bob Simpson.  He can be reached via email here

The City of Quesnel has been attempting to obtain a community forest since the inception of the program in the 1990s. Despite numerous attempts, and despite being one of BC’s most forest dependent communities, the City, for a variety of reasons, was not successful in achieving a community forest license while many other communities in the North were. That’s about to change. 

During the most recent reset of the Annual Allowable Cut for the Quesnel Timber Supply Area, the Minister of Forests created a new allocation of timber for a community forest license, as well as more volume for First Nations licenses. Creating the opportunity for a community forest and more First Nations’ volume at that time was a bold step by the provincial government, as the total volume available to harvest in the Quesnel Timber Supply Area was declining significantly and many of us thought the opportunity for Quesnel to achieve a community forest had long past.

The province also made another bold move when it offered this new community forest allocation not simply to the City, but to a much broader potential partnership group made up of the City of Quesnel, the Cariboo Regional District, and four First Nations governments (Lhtako, Nazko, Lhoosk’uz, and Esdilagh). 

At its core, community forestry is about local control over and enjoyment of the monetary and non-monetary benefits offered by local forest resources. A community forest license also provides a way to involve residents more directly in the stewardship of the land base surrounding their communities. By offering the potential community forest license to all the local governments in our region, including First Nations, the province enabled Quesnel’s community forest to be a powerful tool for reconciliation. 

Over the past two years, the City of Quesnel, Lhtako, Lhoosk’uz, Nazko, and Esdilagh have been working collaboratively to form a partnership (the CRD chose to withdraw from the provincial offer) that would ultimately manage the forest lands surrounding the City of Quesnel for a variety of values and interests: ecosystem health and resiliency, watershed protection, fire prevention, recreation, respect for traditional use by First Nations, education and training in alternate forest management techniques, timber and fibre harvesting, innovative forest management and manufacturing, and employment. 

At the group’s last meeting there was also general agreement on the potential land base that might be included in the community forest application. A land base that roughly mirrors the City’s wildfire protection plan area plus crown land to the southeast and to the northwest of the Fraser River. 

The group is now seeking public input into its application for a community forest license and invites you to participate by means of a survey online: bit.ly/34hQS56 or paper copies are available at each government’s office. They want to know what a community forest means to you and what interests and values you’d like to see achieved through this forest license.  

The survey is open until March 31 and your input will be incorporated into the final application that the group will submit to the provincial government this fall. Please take the time to have your say in this important initiative.


Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Cariboo RD Board debates WL Community Forest

Yesterday, 2 people were looking for "CRD and Community Forest"....

This past Friday, Cariboo RD Area 'F' Director Joan Sorley, with residents from Big Lake, Horsefly/Likely and Miocene in the public gallery, attempted to convince her colleagues to pass a motion to authorize a letter of support for the WL Community Forest on condition that an agreement be sought with respect to revenue and consultation.  Director Sorley expressed disappointment that a number of meetings had occurred, commitments were made and those commitments were not acted upon and residents of Big Lake and surrounding communities are seeking a Community Forest that works for everyone and if no solution is forthcoming - then the Community Forest may impact residents to a maximum of 100 years (5 - 20 year renewable community forest license)

City of WL Director (and Mayor) Kerry Cook argued against the motion citing the fact that the application for the WL Community Forest is now before the Minister and went over the history of the WL Community Forest which goes back several years including it being worked on by former WL Mayor Scott Nelson's Council

Area 'J' Director Roger William said he was concerned about 'in-fighting' between non-aboriginal/aboriginal communities but sympathized with the WL Indian Band to getting a Community Forest license in place for their members...

Area 'E' Director Byron Kemp said that he was disappointed with the lack of consultation from the City of WL on the Community Forest, given 20% of it is in Area 'E', even though the previous Director (Steve Mazur) didn't take issue with it during the last term (2008-2011)

100 Mile Director (and Mayor) Mitch Campsall asked Director Sorley if the Big Lake community was taking the same stance towards Tolko/West Fraser as it was towards Williams Lake

Quesnel Director (and Mayor) Mary Sjostrom questioned the need to write a letter of support, given the Ministry of Forests was going to do consultation with all sides (Big Lake & Williams Lake) in any event.  A point repeated by CRD Chair Al Richmond

The Board voted to defeat the letter of support motion, as proposed by Director Sorley.  The Board also voted to defeat the following motion:

'That the agenda item summary from Bernice Crowe, Executive Assistant, dated November 14, 2012, regarding an item referred from the September 19th and October 24th meetings on the Proposed Williams Lake Community Forest, be received. Further, that a letter be forwarded to the City of Williams Lake and the Williams Lake Indian Band Community informing them that the Cariboo Regional District is deferring their request for the Cariboo Regional District to administer 5% of the net profits generated from the Community Forest application until all communities involved are in agreement. Further, that a letter be forwarded to Minister Steve Thomson, Minister of Forest Lands and Natural Resource Operations informing him that the Cariboo Regional District supports the request from Big Lake, Horsefly and Miocene to meet with him to work towards a more equitable arrangement for the proposed Williams Lake Community Forest.'

As I've said previously - I long suspected the Board will vote to not involve themselves in the fight between Big Lake and Williams Lake/Sugarcane over the proposed WL Community Forest.  Meanwhile - I profound regret the tone used by 100 Mile Director Mitch Campsall in his comments.  Comparing the request of Big Lake on the WL Community Forest to private forest companies showed that he hadn't read the background documents but kudos to Director Sorley for staying above the fray...

Finally - during a brief recess, Williams Lake Director Kerry Cook boasted to The Rush:

From the City's perspective - the Board made the right decision...

I wonder if the City's Community Forest partner - WL Indian Band and their Chief, Ann Louie, will feel the same way...