Council is legally required to formally consult with the
public prior to approving the City’s annual budget and establishing the
property taxation needed to achieve that budget. Over the years, numerous
methods have been used to meet that obligation, and, more importantly, get
meaningful and informed feedback on the City’s programs and services, as well
as the proposed capital and operating budgets. Unfortunately, as much as people say they are concerned about their
taxes, we’ve not found a way to truly canvass and discuss those concerns with
ratepayers prior to setting new tax rates. Well advertised meetings and town
halls did not work, as the turn out to these events was always very small and
the feedback often limited to whatever the issue of the day happened to be.
Four years ago, the City started to gather information from an online survey
that showed a positive trend of engagement and reasonable numbers of people
participating, up until this year. This year’s budget survey saw just over a hundred
self-identified City residents participate in the process, down from a high
of over 400 people. This is still a higher participation rate than in-person
meetings, but the downward trend is disappointing. Nevertheless, the
information obtained by Council from those who did take the time to fill in
the survey and provide commentary is important and will be considered in this
year and next year’s budget deliberations. Overall, the respondents indicated they were ‘very satisfied’
or ‘somewhat satisfied’ with the City’s services and programs, with only 4.2%
stating they were ‘dissatisfied.’ The survey participants indicated that
they’d like to see more emphasis put on road and bridge maintenance and RCMP,
along with a greater focus on emergency preparedness and mitigation. The commentary at the end of the survey suggests that the
currently compromised Johnston Bridge may have skewed the respondents’
emphasis toward ‘road and bridge maintenance.’ However, the repair of this
bridge is beyond Council’s budgetary discretion, as it cannot be repaired
without voter assent through a referendum. Residents will be provided with a
more detailed review of the status of the Johnston Bridge in the coming
months that will clarify both the options for the bridge’s repair and the
ways that it might be funded. Survey respondents also indicated to Council that they’d like
to see the City continue to improve parks and amenities, including trails,
and pursue zero waste and climate change initiatives. However, the top of
mind issues appear to be housing and neighbourhood/business area planning –
affirming what Council is hearing from the public on a daily basis. Housing is already a focus for Council and we’re hoping that
this year we’ll see a breakthrough on both new market and social housing developments.
Council has also approved two neighbourhood planning initiatives that the
public will be able to participate in through our new “Let’s Connect”
engagement tool. letsconnectquesnel.ca This year’s budget survey also asked City ratepayers if they
would support being taxed directly for more senior’s services and more social
programs. In both cases the majority of respondents indicated they were open
to this kind of direct taxation; however, more consultation is needed before
any incremental taxation occurs for these services. Council’s Finance Committee appreciates the input from those
who took the time to fill in this year’s survey and will include the insights
gleaned from the survey in the formulation of the City’s operating budget,
which will be presented to Council (and the public) in the coming weeks. |
Discussion of the issues that affect you on a local, provincial and federal level
Wednesday, January 19, 2022
Quesnel Budget Survey Results
Courtesy of the City of Quesnel:
Editor's Note -- this week's Quesnel Council Column is written by Quesnel Mayor Bob Simpson. He can be reached via email here
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment